Numbers 16:1-18:32 | 1 Samuel 11:14-12:22 | Mark 14:53-72
This week's edition of The Set Table contains:
Questions and Commentary on Parashat Qorach
Chayyei Yeshua - A Devotional Commentary on the Besora Reading
Looking Ahead
Questions & Commentary on Parashat Qorach
1. How does the story of Qorach show us a
perversion of the quest for equality?
Benjamin
Ehrenfeld
This week's parasha
tells us of a man who gathered a group of followers in the wilderness
community together to stand up for their rights. These former slaves
had been lorded over for so many years and for a "promised land,"
which none of them had seen any sign of, they were following these two
men named Moses and Aaron. The Lord had made it explicitly clear that
he intended all of the community to be holy and that he would dwell
with all of them. So Qorach essentially asks, "Why is that this man
and his brother are the leaders? When we heard the Voice, the Lord said
all of us would be holy. Now we're hearing second-hand from them about
the Lord's will. This doesn't seem right." This is what the text
says:
"They
[Qorach and his cohorts] combined against Moses and Aaron and said to
them, "you have gone too far! For all the community are holy, all
of them, and the Lord is in their midst. Why then do you raise yourselves
above the Lord's congregation."
Numbers
16:3 (NJPS)
Moses proceeds to
do what he normally does when there's a major issue with the community
. . . he falls on his face. Why? It is almost as if he is aware that
people are going to die because of this. One could see from a certain
point of view that Qorach may have a right to question this. The LORD
DID say that they were all supposed to be holy. Why this seeming hierarchy?
Why was
this so important to maintain that the LORD causes the earth to swallow
up Qorach and his uprising a few verses later?
There are many possible
answers, but I offer the following for your consideration: the difference
between equality and anarchy is the demarcation of responsibility. Qorach
challenged the fundamental demarcation of responsibility that the Lord
had set up for the people. A community cannot stand when everyone is
trying to be the one who they think is on top. Furthermore, the one
on top won't stay there for very long if that person thinks he or
she has it all. When the Lord calls the people to be holy, he repeatedly
gives responsibilities to all the different classes of Israelites. No
one responsibility is treated as being better than another. This is
what Qorach forgot. He forgot that he was a Levite, a status that may
have been enviable by others in its own right. He asked for the blessing
that God promised his people by undermining the system that made that
blessing possible.
We have all met people
in our communities who ask, "Why is he/she so special . . .
who made that person in charge...why can't I be picked?" Some of
us have said these things ourselves at one point or another. This is
the voice of Qorach. This is the voice of Qorach the Levite who could
not accept what made him special. He had to take hold of that at the
expense of those who he felt dealt themselves the better hand. Equality
does not mean everyone gets equal everything. Equality means everyone
is valued for who they are and what they do bring. This is not to say
that we shouldn't stand up for injustice, but the parasha teaches
us to examine very closely what it is that we think we are being deprived
of. Is our value really being undermined, or do we just want a piece
of someone else's pie that we think is better than our own?
I pray our communities
can be places where no one authority holds on to his or her power at
the expense of others. The Lord will not let a Qorach stay in power
for too long. With that said, I pray that all of us can examine our
hearts and ask the question: Will I long for someone else's holiness,
or can I serve and grow with the holiness that is my own?
2. Who are God's
Priests?
Yitzhaq ben Benoni
Parashat Qorach
recounts the unfortunate story of a dispute over priestly election.
According to rabbinic tradition, Qorach (son of Izhar son of Kohath
son of Levi) pointed out how the leadership and priesthood of Israel
were assigned to Moses and Aaron, both of whom were sons of Amram, the
eldest son of Kohath. Since Qorach was the eldest son of the second
son of Kohath (Izhar), he felt entitled to hold the position of leadership
in his family. But this role was assigned instead to Elizaphan son of
Uzziel, the youngest son of Kohath (Tanhuma Qorach 3; Numbers
Rabba 18:2). Thus, the rabbis associated the revolt of Qorach with
the many other disputes between brothers in the Torah: Cain vs. Abel,
Isaac vs. Ishmael, Esau vs. Jacob, Joseph vs. Reuben (or Judah), Manasseh
vs. Ephraim, and so on. The repetition in the Torah narrative of such
disputes between firstborns and "Benjamins" of the family are so
numerous that they seem to stand in tension with the legal portions
of the Torah that try to guarantee the firstborn's right to his unique
inheritance. Thus, for example, we find elsewhere that a man who has
two wives (one beloved and the other hated) must not bequeath the double
portion of his possessions to the firstborn of the beloved wife if the
hated wife gave birth to a son before the beloved wife (Deuteronomy
21:15-17). This passage, like many other prescriptive texts guaranteeing
special rights to the firstborn, is countered by the aforementioned
descriptions on how last-born sons meritoriously achieved their elder
brother's blessings. An ambivalent discussion emerges then within
the Written Torah over the question of election through divine selection
vs. election through human meritocracy.
In addition, the Written
Torah itself explicitly describes Qorach's own complaint in the following
way: "You have gone too far! All the congregation are holy, every
one of them, and the LORD is among them. So why then do you exalt yourselves
above the assembly of the LORD?" (Numbers 16:3). For Qorach, Aaron's
priesthood (and perhaps also Moses' prophetic vocation) is called
into question, since, in his eyes, all of God's people are holy. Why
then should Aaron keep the holy priesthood to himself? The conflict
between Qorach and Moses and Aaron resonates with the ongoing dispute
between Israel and the Church over choseness. Like brothers fighting
over their birthright privileges, each side has tried to affirm their
own mission at the cost of canceling the other group's calling. Like
Qorach, the Church has had a hard time swallowing the scandalous election
given in the Torah to a particular ethnic people. Many today, like Qorach,
would argue that since the arrival of the Church, all believers are
holy, and, consequently, Israel's exclusive vocation loses all its
meaning. Judaism, on its side, has held on to its particularistic notions
without fully acknowledging how God may have brought in a new era of
redemption through the gathering of the nations. But this dispute does
not need to end like Qorach's rebellion. Both entities can respect
each other's particular calling. Messianic Judaism can play an important
role in that process.

Mark 14:53-72 - Who is Yeshua?
Sean
Emslie
This may seem an odd
question, but earlier in the book of Mark, Yeshua asks his talmidim,
who people were saying he was and then he asked who they thought he
was. They respond:
"Some
say you are Yochanan the Immerser," they told him, "others say Eliyahu,
and still others, one of the prophets." "But you," he asked, "who
do you say I am?" Kefa answered, "You are the Mashiach."
Mark
8:27-29
The answer given by
Kefa was important and in a parallel passage in Matthew, Yeshua responds
that Kefa's affirmation of Yeshua's Messiahship was to be the foundation
on which the Messianic community would be built (Matthew 16:16-18).
In this week's Besora
reading we come to the trial of Yeshua before the Sanhedrin and Yeshua's
answer to the question of his identity. In this passage from Mark, we
read:
The
cohen haggadol stood up in the front and asked Yeshua, "Have you
nothing to say to the accusations these men are making?" But he remained
silent and made no reply. Again the cohen haggadol questioned
him: "Are you the Mashiach Ben-HaMevorakh?" "I AM," answered
Yeshua. "Moreover, you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right
hand of the Almighty and coming on the clouds of heaven."
Mark
14:60-62
When he was asked
who he was, Yeshua identified himself as both Messiah and the Son of
God (Ben-HaMevorakh) and further identified himself as the Son
of Man, the apocalyptic figure of Daniel who would come at the end of
days. What can we learn from our Messiah about the vital issue of who
Yeshua is as we are building Messianic Judaism for today and for
the future?
First, it is vital
that we recognize and honor Yeshua as the Jewish Messiah. We need to
take this to heart that we are a Judaism with a Messiah amongst us and
empowering us to live God-honoring, Torah-faithful lives. The affirmation
of Yeshua as Messiah led the early talmidim to exclaim: "We have found
the Messiah. We've found the one Moses wrote about in the Torah, also
the Prophets - it's Yeshua Ben-Yosef from Natzeret!" (John 1:41,
45).
Like these talmidim
we have found the Messiah! Yeshua is the Jewish Messiah, the Hope
of Israel, the Root and Offspring of David and the One in whom the promises
made to the Ancestors is uniquely answered.
Second, we should
embrace Yeshua as the Son of God, the very word of God who became a
first century Jew to live a life of absolute faithfulness to the Father
as our example and to lay down his life for our atonement.
To be a Messianic
Judaism that truly follows Yeshua we need to take these two designations
of Yeshua's own self-identification and embrace them and follow him
who is both Messiah and Son of God. May we follow Yeshua's example
and seek to order our lives by God's Torah and thereby be faithful
followers of our righteous Messiah.
NEXT WEEK'S READINGS - PARASHAT CHUQQAT-BALAQ
Numbers 19:1-25:9
Micah 5:6-6:8
Mark 15:1-15
|