Who's Online

No Users Online
The Set Table - Shemot 5769 PDF Print E-mail

Exodus 1:1-6:1 | Isaiah 27:6-28:13; 29:22-23 (Ashkenazim)| Jeremiah 1:1-2:3 (Sepharadim)| Matthew 5:17-26

This week's edition of The Set Table contains:

Questions and Commentary on Shabbat Shemot
Chayyei Yeshua - A Devotional Commentary on the Besora Reading
Looking Ahead

Questions & Commentary on Parashat Shemot

1. Why did Pharaoh decree that all the Jewish baby boys be put to death by drowning? Why did Moses' parents risk their lives to save their son when so many other parents did not? Was their anything unique about Moses and his birth? How does Moses' birth parallel Messiah Yeshua's birth? 

Rabbi Jason Sobel

On the level of peshat (contextual interpretation), Pharaoh was frightened by the fact that the Jewish people had become too numerous and might militarily turn against the Egyptians (Exodus 1:10). The darshan offers an explanation: 

AND PHARAOH CHARGED ALL HIS PEOPLE (1:22). Because his astrologers told him, ‘The mother of Israel's savior is already pregnant with him, but we do not know whether he is an Israelite or an Egyptian.' Then Pharaoh assembled all the Egyptians before him and said: ‘Lend me your children for nine months that I may cast them in the river . . .' But they would not agree, saying: ‘An Egyptian son would not redeem them; he must be a Hebrew . . .' Why did they decree that they should cast them into the river? Because the astrologers foresaw that Israel's savior would be smitten by means of water, and they thought that he would be drowned in the water; but, as we know, it was only on account of the well of water (of Meribah) that the decree of death was pronounced upon him, as it is said: Because you believed not Torah.

    Exodus Rabba 1:18

Thus, according to the Sages, the reason Pharaoh tried to drown all newborn males was due to the counsel of his astrologers [wise men] who foresaw that Israel's redeemer's downfall would occur by the means of water.  They, however, inaccurately interpreted when and through which body of water Moses' downfall would occur.   

In Jewish tradition the birth of Moses was unique in many ways.  First, there was the miraculous conception of Moses whom Yocheved bore at the old age of one hundred and thirty (according to Rashi). This was followed by Miriam's prophetic announcement that her brother was going to be the redeemer of Israel. Her prophecy was later confirmed by a miraculous sign at his birth which we read about in b. Sota 12a:      

‘My mother will bear a son who will be the savior of Israel'. When Moses was born, the whole house was filled with light; and her father arose and kissed her upon her head, saying ‘My daughter, your prophecy has been fulfilled'; but when they cast him into the river, her father said: ‘What, now, has become of your prophecy!' That is what is written: And his sister stood afar off to know what would be done to him - what would be the fate of her prophecy.  

The same divine light that filled his parent's home also was made manifest to Pharaoh's daughter. According to the Talmud, when she opened Moses' basket she saw that "the Shechina (divine presence) was with him" (b. Sota 12b).  Both Moses' parents and Pharaoh's daughter willingly defy the king's decree and rescue Moses for they saw that God was with him in a special way.   

Though the above description of the birth of Moses comes from much later than the descriptions we have of Messiah Yeshua's birth, there are a number of interesting parallels.  Both of their birth accounts involve a miraculous conception, astrologers who announce the birth of Israel's redeemer, a cruel gentile king who tries to take their life and in the process slaughters innocent Jewish baby boys, a prophetic word spoken to their parents about their son's divine mission, and both were raised as children in Egypt. As R. Levi states, "As it was with the first redeemer so will be it be with the last redeemer" (Numbers Rabba 11:3). Those of us who follow Messiah Yeshua confess that he is indeed the last and ultimate redeemer. 

 

2. How do we understand The LORD's answer to Moses' question, "what is your name" (Exodus 3:13)? How does this relate to Yeshua's answer to his doubters in John 8? 

Nick Amic

In the episode of Moses' encounter with God in the desert, Moses is given the highest of all tasks-to act as God's agent of deliverance for and founder of the Jewish nation. Moses asks a most puzzling question in response: "What is your name?" (Exodus 3:13). Further, it appears from a subsequent inquiry that Moses anticipates two groups who will ask this question-the "elders" (cf. 3:16, 18) who will listen to Moses, and doubting scoffers (4:1). Moses' initial question can be understood as having two dimensions: the believing elders ask, "Which ‘name/attribute' is God acting through"; while the scoffers ask, "Which ‘god' sent you, because it surely isn't the LORD!?" 

God's answer to Moses has been the subject of discussion and debate for the past few millennia. The earliest interpretations in Talmud and Midrash understand Eheyeh asher Eheyeh in two basic categories: as a promise (b. Berachot 9b) and as a divine name (e.g. b. Shevuot 35a). This corresponds to the two levels on which Moses asks for clarification: to the scoffers God responds Eheyeh asher Eheyeh-"I AM that I AM", or "the One that is self-existent and above all"; and to the elders God responds Eheyeh-the first person conjugation of YHVH, God's name of compassion. Martin Buber, the 20th century Jewish philosopher, points out that God's response is couched between two verses of promise (Exodus 3:12 and 4:12, which both contain the word Eheyeh) indicating that God will be with Moses in his daunting journey (Moses: The Revelation And The Covenant, 51-52). Why does God need to remind Moses twice? The Talmud answers that, "The Holy One said to Moses, ‘I am with you in this servitude, and I shall be with you in the servitude of the (other) kingdoms'" (b. Berachot 9a). This hints that God has a double mission initiated through Moses, and completed in the future. 

Like Moses, Yeshua encountered a similar scenario, a daunting task of deliverance ripe with unbelievers. When Yeshua is confronted by scoffers questioning his authority, John quotes Yeshua's response, "I tell you the truth . . . I AM" (8:58). Yeshua responds to his doubters by citing his pre-existence, making use of the name of God's self-existence-I AM (cf. John 1). The most significant aspect of this connection is that Yeshua, as the second Moses, culminates God's process of deliverance initiated in the exodus. The essence of God's response to Moses' inquiry of God's name implies a "double" salvation in which each instance God is personally involved-first through his agent Moses and last in the person of Yeshua.. This doubling of God's name is found later in a different occasion of God's deliverance: the sin of the golden calf. Here God's attribute of mercy through the name of the LORD is doubled again: "The LORD, the LORD, compassionate and gracious God" (Exodus 34:6-7). The commentators ask why God's name is doubled here. They respond that the doubling of God's name is to show that God is the same both before an individual sins and after an individual sins. May all Israel know God's compassion on a personal and national level through Yeshua's deliverance.  



Matthew 5:17-26 - The Language of Blessing

Nathan Joiner

I sometimes wonder what Yeshua thinks regarding how his words are passed down throughout the generations; through different times and cultures; though translations, and interpretations; through different paradigms and worldviews. They always seem to stand the test of time. There is something unique and poignant in Yeshua's sermon on the mount in Matthew.  

We might be able to gain some insights by looking at verse 20, "For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the Torah, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven" What does he mean for our righteousness to surpass that of the Torah teachers and Pharisees? Traditionally this has been interpreted to mean that Yeshua is calling his followers to a new code of righteousness, one that is "both quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from that of the Torah" (NLT study bible). The listeners are no longer to follow the commandments of the Torah, but only heed the "heart of the Torah."  But can these two be separated?  Yeshua says in verse 17, "do not think that I have come to abolish the Torah or Prophets; I have come to fulfill them."  The Greek for "fulfill," Plerosai, can mean to make full or to fill up. If we read the text this way, Yeshua is saying that he didn't come to abolish or abrogate the Torah, but to fill it up. Rather then asking us to reject the Pharisees for another means of righteousness, which would only be incomplete, Yeshua is asking us to live according to the fullness of the Torah. In other words, we need to be living as Torah observant Jews, yet within the deeper values that Yeshua brought forth from the Torah.   

Yeshua is speaking in the context of observant Jews, telling them that they cannot just follow the traditions alone. He is calling them to fulfill the commandments even more than tradition mandates. In the following verses Yeshua calls them to an ever-deeper understanding of what it means to murder. He says "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not Murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment' but I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment."   This isn't license to go kill people as long as we aren't angry. Yeshua is taking a commandment and filling it up. He's expounding on it and revealing an understanding that goes beyond the surface.  

Yeshua is revealing to them the deeper understanding and motivation, which must accompany their traditions.  In Matthew 23 Yeshua criticized the Pharisees for their hypocrisy while tithing spices. "You give a tenth of your spices-mint, dill, cumin. But you neglect the more weighty matters of the Torah: justice, mercy, and faithfulness." Yeshua doesn't then tell the Pharisees to quite tithing spices and just follow the moral commands. Instead he says,  "You should have practiced the latter [tithing] without neglecting the former [Justice mercy and faithfulness.]"    

By extension, we can do our very best to live in obedience to the covenant, without neglecting the more weighty matters of the Torah. We are to be to be filled full with God's commands through the very heart of our beloved Messiah.

 

NEXT WEEK'S READINGS - PARASHAT VA'ERA

 

Exodus 6:2-9:35
Ezekiel 28:25-29:21
Matthew 6:1-18

 

 
< Prev   Next >