Genesis 23:1-25:18 | 1 Kings 1:1-31 | Luke 3:1-17
This week's edition of The Set Table contains:
Questions and Commentary on Shabbat Chayyei Sara
Chayyei Yeshua - A Devotional Commentary on the Besora Reading
Looking Ahead
Questions & Commentary on Parashat Chayyei Sara
1. What relevance does the purchase of the Machpela Cave have for us today?
Seth Ben-Haim
Last week's portion, Vayyera ends with the binding of Yitzhak and Abraham's return to Be'er
Sheva. This week's portion Chayyei Sara ("the
Life of Sarah") begins with the numbering of a woman's life. 127 years! We then
read that she died in Kiryat Arba, which is in Hebron in the Land of Canaan.
The sages say that Sarah died upon hearing of the binding of Yitzhak. Abraham
comes and mourns for the loss of his wife. He arises from his mourning and
desires to purchase a burial plot for Sarah. Mysteriously the Torah, which
often covers great distances of time or space in only a few verses, "wastes" a
whole chapter of our parasha on the
purchase of this plot.
Abraham, who had led a nomadic life in the
Promised Land, had amassed much wealth but no inheritance of land (Ma‘aseh
HaShluchim 7:5). This situation created a problem upon the death of his beloved
wife. This first matriarch, in her death, opens the door in a mysterious way,
to a lasting physical and spiritual claim to the land of Israel. Even though the
LORD had told Abraham that his descendants would go out of the Land, he did not
consider it too much to spend an exorbitant amount on the purchase of the field
and the cave of Machpela, Maarat HaMakhpela
Rashi suggests that this cave
was a double cave with an outer and inner or upper and lower room. The Talmud
states in b. Eruvin 53 that it is the
burial place of four couples starting with Adam and Eve and including all the
Patriarchs and Matriarchs apart from Rachel who was buried in Bethlehem.
Abarbanel explains that Abraham knew that it was the burial place of
Adam and Eve and this is the reason that he chose this particular field and
cave and is willing to pay an exorbitant fee. There is a Jewish tradition that
says the Messiah will come and raise the Patriarchs at the Machpela first upon
his arrival.
While one could question why Abraham needs to buy this plot for the
burial of Sarah. After all he has been repeatedly promised by the LORD that the
whole length and breadth of the Land will be given for his desendents. Abraham
gives us an example of how we show respect and care for those who live and
those that are to come, through the care for the deceased. Abraham exhibits
faith once again, not allowing reality to stifle vision.
Though offered the land for free, he knows that he must
purchase it so that the future generations will be able to lay claim to it.
What is given without price, has the potential to be taken back, Abraham
removes the possibility of argument. The
sages speak about the traditional purchases of the Machpela in Hebron, the
Temple Mount in Jerusalem and Joseph's Tomb in Shechem as sites that prove a
legitamate eternal claim to the Land. The properties were purchased at high
prices, to ensure that our heartland would never be able to be given up.
This Shabbat is one of the few times of year when Jews are allowed full
access to the Machpela and many will travel there to pray at this first claim
to the Land. Most Jews who attend will not go to pray for the dead, but to pray
for the living and to thank the LORD for giving us this Land that flows with
Milk and Honey.
Many people have found in our times that making aliya carries with it a high price tag, and yet these the
descendents prepared for us the decendants sparing nothing to ensure that these
central hills would be set apart as our inheritance for all generations. The Messiah,
in John 9, speaks of the confusion related to the opening of the eyes of a
blind man. We need to have open eyes of faith like Abraham who purchased this
plot, investing in the future. We can learn from the investment of Abraham into
things that last. Let's invest like Abraham for the next generations. Let's invest
in faith, believing that the unseen, in no way limits God's fulfillment of our
restoration as a people, the return of the Messiah and the restoration of the
world.
2. The
second clause of the opening verse of our parasha
(Genesis 23:1; "Sarah lived 127 years; the years of Sarah's life") seems
redundant. Rashi, however, holds that the Torah repeats the phrase, "the years
of Sarah's life" in order to teach us that the years of her life "were equal in
goodness." How can Rashi say that every year of Sarah's entire life was equally
good when she experienced many difficulties such as barrenness and being held
captive by Abimelech and Pharaoh? What then does Rashi's comment mean? What should it teach us about our attitude
and actions when we experience the joys and hardships of life?
Rabbi Jason Sobel
Commenting
on this question one commentator remarks, "Although Sarah experienced difficult
years during her lifetime, she paid them no attention but accepted everything
graciously and with good cheer - the bad along with the good. This is what
Rashi means by ‘equal in goodness' - even the bad she accepted lovingly" In
line with this, our sages teach that it is incumbent upon us to bless God for
both good and bad tidings (b. Berachot
60b). Thus according to Jewish, when Jewish people receive unusually good news
we recite the beracha (blessing),
"Blessed are you LORD our God, King of the universe, who is good and who
bestows good." Upon receiving really bad news, like the death of loved one, we
say, "Blessed are you LORD our God, King of the universe, who is the true
Judge." It is easy to understand why we should bless God for the beneficent
goodness bestowed upon us. Is this not what thanksgiving is all about? But it
is much harder to understand why we should receive bad things with gladness and
in turn respond by blessing God. On the surface this seems a little crazy! Our
sages however hold that this is a biblical obligation derived from the life of
Job, who after suffering much personal pain and loss said, "The Lord gave and
the Lord has taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord" (Job 1:21).
But
this still does not answer the question how Sarah or Job could cultivate such a
mature and godly attitude toward life? In the Talmud (b. Berachot 60b) there is a beautiful story that illustrates how
such a perspective is possible.
R. Huna said in
the name of Rab citing R. Meir, and so it was taught in the name of R. Akiba: A
man should always accustom himself to say ‘Whatever the All-Merciful does is
for good', [as exemplified in] the following incident. R. Akiba was once going
along the road and he came to a certain town and looked for lodgings but was
everywhere refused. He said ‘Whatever the All-Merciful does is for good', and
he went and spent the night in the open field. He had with him a cock, an ass
and a lamp. A gust of wind came and blew out the lamp, a weasel came and ate
the cock, a lion came and ate the ass. He said: ‘Whatever the All-Merciful does
is for good'. The same night some brigands came and carried off the inhabitants
of the town. He said to them: Did I not say to you, ‘Whatever the All-Merciful
does is all for good?'
Despite
the fact that Sarah had a significant amount of difficulty in her life, she was
able to accept everything that happened with joy because of her belief in God's
goodness and sovereignty. Shaul, who suffered greatly for the sake of Messiah,
also knew this secret; for true joy is based on the belief that "all things
work together for good to those who love God, and who are the called according
to God's purpose" (Romans 8:28). If we really believe this like Sarah and Shaul
did, then we will also live a positive, joyous, faith-filled life worth
emulating. Then it will be said of us like it was of Sarah, that all our years
were equal in goodness.
Luke 3:1-17
David Nichol
It seems, if one thinks about it, a bit strange that
the story of Yeshua, as told in the four besorot,
begins with another man, Yochanan. In each, Yochanan sets the stage, only to
essentially disappear from it early on. In our passage he is introduced by a
passage from Isaiah:
The voice of one crying out in the wilderness:
"Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. Every valley shall be
filled, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and the crooked shall be
made straight, and the rough ways made smooth; and all flesh shall see the
salvation of God."
Isaiah 40:3-5
Yochanan's specialty is, apparently, tough love.
Crowds of people come to him to undergo his tevila,
or immersion, of repentance (teshuva).
Those who come, he chastises: "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to
come? Bear fruits worthy of repentance." He is portrayed as a man who pulls no
punches, whose message is one of ethical purity, whose reproachful tone is
unflinching. Indeed, if Isaiah is describing a day of God's salvation as one of
radical upheaval - when valleys will be filled and mountains made low -
Yochanan is an appropriate herald for it.
Clearly Yochanan buys into this idea that the
"salvation of God" will be accompanied by drama. When queried about the
Messiah, he speaks of one whose "winnowing fork is in his hand, to clear his
threshing floor and to gather the wheat into the granary; but the chaff he will
burn with unquenchable fire" (v. 16). In his mind, the advent of Messiah and
God's salvation of Israel will be fundamentally discontinuous from life as we
know it and destruction is in store for those on the wrong side. To that end,
he uses tevilia and teshuva as a ritual one-two punch to
elicit forgiveness of sins - a way to get on the right side before the coming
"wrath."
While Yochanan specifically identified Yeshua as the
Messiah, as well as the one in whom his own work culminated, the two men are
often seen as contrasting figures. Yochanan is often portrayed as the ascetic,
apocalyptic, fundamentalist revolutionary. He is radical and unbending,
preaching fire and brimstone. On the other hand, many see Yeshua as the
conciliatory, bleeding-heart softy, who preaches love and peace.
There may be nuggets of truth in these caricatures,
but the distance between them is overstated. Yochanan does not advocate
revolution by force of arms or violent measures. Rather, he is a moral
subversive. He meets his death not because of political or military rebellion,
but because he challenged the validity of Herod Antipas' marriage according to
Jewish law (Matthew 14:1-12).
Yeshua, of course, was also killed because of his
role as a subversive. His revolution is presented in the besorot as fundamentally continuo us with Yochanan's saw that Torah
had been used to alienate the poor, the sick, and the powerless, precisely
those it was meant to protect and enfranchise (Mark 7:10-13). He saw the
powerful seek to maintain their power, so he bequeathed the earth to the meek
(Matthew 5:5; 18:1-5).
In the kingdom Yeshua promised to establish, the
great ones are those who serve others, while those who seek power to coerce are
humbled (Luke 1:48-55). The lives and righteous deaths of Yeshua and Yochanan
remind us to disavow the will to power, take on the yoke of the kingdom of
heaven, and imitate Yeshua in becoming a servant to all (Mark 10:42-45).
NEXT WEEK'S READINGS
- PARASHAT TOLEDOT
Genesis 25:19-28:9
Malachi 1:1-2:7
Matthew 3:13–4:11
|