Who's Online

No Users Online
The Set Table - Mas'ei 5768 PDF Print E-mail

 


Numbers 33:1-36:13 - Numbers 28:9-15 - Isaiah 66:1-24 - John 18:28-19:16

This week's edition of The Set Table contains:

Questions and Commentary on Shabbat Mas'ei
Chayyei Yeshua - A Devotional Commentary on the Besora Reading
In Summary

Looking Ahead

Questions & Commentary on Parashat Mattot

1. In what way does our faith in Yeshua affect our vision of how the Jewish people should relate to the State of Israel, the Diaspora, and the non-Jewish world?

Yitzhaq ben Benoni

Parashat Mas‘ei closes the book of Bemidbar (Numbers) and falls this year between the 17th of Tammuz and Tisha B'Av, a period during which certain Jews remember the painful experience our Jewish people went through during the two destructions of the Temple in Jerusalem. The Hebrew noun mas‘ei in its singular form is mas‘a and is translated into English as "departure" or "march." Our parasha recounts the daily marches of the Israelites during their forty-year journey as nomads in the Middle Eastern deserts. The word mas‘a is related to the verb nasa which in Modern Hebrew is used as the main verb to express traveling, while in biblical Hebrew literally denotes the action of "pulling out tent pegs," hence to "break camp" and journey.

The long journey of the Israelites is emphasized by the repetition of the verb nasa, which is mentioned not less than thirty three times in Numbers 33: "They set out (nasa) from Rameses in the first month" (Numbers 33:3); "they set (nasa) out from Sukkot and encamped at Etham" (33:6); and so on. This detailed itinerary is paralleled by the delineation of the borders of the Land of Israel, which Israel was set on occupying back then:

Your southern sector shall extend from the wilderness of Zin alongside Edom. . . . For the western boundary you shall have the coast of the Great Sea; that shall serve as your western boundary.

This shall be your northern boundary: Draw a line from the Great Sea to Mount Hor; from Mount Hor draw a line to Lebo-hamath, and let the boundary reach Zedad. . . . For your eastern boundary you shall draw a line from Hazar-enan to Shepham. From Shepham the boundary shall descend to Riblah on the east side of Ain; from there the boundary shall continue downward and abut on the eastern slopes of the Sea of Chinnereth. The boundary shall then descend along the Jordan and terminate at the Dead Sea.

         Numbers 34:3-12

The Israelites were also commanded upon their arrival into Canaan to dispossess all the inhabitants of the land and destroy their figured objects, molten images, and cult places (Numbers 33:52). Some religious Zionists assume full responsibility for literally expanding the Israeli State in order to possess all of the land as described in the aforementioned verses. But certainly the situation described in the Torah is not identical to the ongoing conflict that is now happening in Israel-Palestine. At least, there are no non-Jewish inhabitants worshiping figured objects and molten images in remote cultic places somewhere on the other side of the Jordan River.

Although Parashat Mas‘ei testifies to the long historical link that has ever existed between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel, it also reminds us of the enriching and defining experience that has molded the expression of Jewish faith over the last two millennia: masa. Judaism in the past as well as in the present has always found itself within this tension: the desire to settle down while collectively journeying in this planet. What will happen to this journey if all of the Jewish people settle in the tiny strip of land, which is today called Israel? Will Judaism not lose an important dimension of its character and spirituality by collectively retreating into a narrowly defined geographical space? Some may believe that such a reality would signal the eschaton and bring in the arrival of a new age. But in the meantime, what is our real mission?

2. "Take possession of the land and settle in it, for I have given you the land to possess" (Numbers 33:53). According to our Rabbis, this verse forms the basis of the commandment of Yishuv Eretz Yisra'el (Settling in the Land of Israel). In light of the Torah and Brit Chadasha, do you think it is a mitzva to live in Israel? Is it incumbent on every Jew to live there today? Is there any benefit to living in Eretz Yisra'el?

Rabbi Jonathan Kaplan

In his comments on Numbers 33:53, the Ramban (R. Moses ben Nachman or Nachmanides, d. ca. 1270) derives a single, positive commandment of Torah - to settle in the Land of Israel and take possession of it. Interestingly his predecessor Rambam (R. Moses ben Maimon or Maimonides, d. 1204) did not include the commandment of Yishuv Eretz Yisra'el in his list of 613 commandments from the Torah.

The rabbis began restricting emigration from the Land of Israel and Jerusalem in particular during the Tannaitic period (1st-2nd centuries CE) thus highlighting the importance of Jewish settlement in the Land.  At the end of tractate Ketubot in the Mishna (the section dealing with marriage contracts), the following injunction is recorded (13:11),

All may be compelled to go up to the land of Israel, but no one may be compelled to leave. All may be compelled to go up to Jerusalem, but no one may be compelled to leave. This includes men and women alike.

Though rabbis in both Babylon and the Land of Israel during the 3rd through the 5th centuries CE acknowledged the authority of this ruling, the sages in Babylon gradually advocated a vision of their community as a center of Jewish life equal to (or greater than) in learning, renown, and status with the community in the Land of Israel. In fact Rav Yehuda, a second generation Babylonian Amora and student of Rav, states in this section (b. Ketubot 110b), "All who go up from Babylonia to the land of Israel transgress a positive commandment."

However, the Babylonian sages continued to envision, as have most Jewish religious leaders, the Land of Israel and Jerusalem as the center of God's messianic promises (see b. Ketubot 111b-112a). In fact the prayer for the State of Israel written by the Israeli Chief Rabbinate emphasizes this conviction when it says that the establishment of the State of Israel is reshit tzemichat ge'ullatenu - "the first flowering of our redemption."

Throughout the Brit Chadasha, there is also a strong emphasis placed on the mitzva of Yishuv Eretz Yisra'el and on Jerusalem and the Land of Israel as the center of Jewish religious life and identity. The early community of messianic believers is headquartered in Jerusalem under the leadership of Ya‘aqov the brother of Yeshua (see Ma‘asei Sheluchim 15). Shaul, the great shaliach of the messianic community in the Land of Israel, considers supporting "the poor in Jerusalem" a central component of his work outside of the Land (Romans 15:25-26; 1 Corinthians 16:33). As a Messianic Jewish community, we should follow the examples of Ya‘aqov, Shaul, and even Yeshua himself and strive to support Yishuv Eretz Yisra'el whether through financial supports or our own fulfillment of this mitzva. For in expressing our commitment to this mitzva, not only are we fulfilling a commandment, but also we are declaring our messianic hope for the realization of the redemption of the Jewish people and the culmination of Yishuv Eretz Yisra'el.

 


David Nichol

John 18:28-19:26 - Yeshua and the Inheritance of Israel 

As our passage begins, Yeshua has been arrested and is taken to the headquarters of the Roman governor, Pilate. His accusers are a group of Judeans who are among Jerusalem's priestly caste, including the kohen haggadol (the High Priest) himself and his associates. Also known in the besorot as Sadducees, this sub-group of kohanim were the nominal leaders of the Jewish people who were often viewed by their countrymen as "in bed with" the Roman occupiers. Though corrupt and power-hungry, however, the kohen haggadol was the legitimate spiritual leader of the nation, as there was only one Temple, and only the kohanim were authorized to perform the temple service that was the focal point of Israel's relationship with God. The Roman governor, Pilate, on the other hand, is known to history as a bloodthirsty ruler who had little compunction about crucifying Jewish troublemakers. 

What follow in the narrative are hours of indecisiveness and back-and-forth between Pilate, the accusers, and Yeshua. The accusers want Yeshua killed, and soon, because Pesach is starting that evening. Pilate seems hesitant, and keeps going back to Yeshua to ask him questions. He is especially hung up on the idea of Yeshua being a king. 

One of the first things the reader should notice here is that, other than Yeshua, none of the actors in this drama act as expected. Why are the spiritual leaders of Israel, on the eve of perhaps the holiest day of the year, so bent on the death of an innocent man? And why is Pilate so hesitant? After his bloody career, what's one more execution? Why does he spend most of his day as a go-between, trying to get Yeshua's accusers to settle for less than his death? 

What the participants of this drama, outside of perhaps Yeshua himself, could not see, but is more clear to us, is the big picture. If he were just another revolutionary, maybe things would not have played out this way. But he is the go'el, the personification and agent of redemption, providing atonement for Israel in its darkest hour. Our Sages say that the Temple was destroyed about forty years after this event because of sinat chinam, unwarranted and immitigable hatred between man and his neighbor. It would be easy to think that the go'el should appear then, when the Romans were breaching the walls of Jerusalem. Surely that was our darkest hour! But that was not our darkest hour, though our political autonomy, our physical, geographical connection to the God of our ancestors, was taken from us by the Roman war machine Rather, even darker was when, as described in our passage, these kohanim, the leaders of our people and the mediators of the covenant, proclaimed with one voice, "We have no king but Caesar!" (8:15).

From this story, and from the fact that God allowed Yeshua to die for the sake of Israel, even after this repudiation of his kingship, we learn several things. First, his love for us is in fact eternal and indestructible. This love extends beyond Israel, to the whole world. If God has not rejected Israel, God will certainly accept any nation or person who comes in teshuva (repentance). Second, though we love our inheritance and remember our holy places, our spiritual connection to God does not rest on places or imperfect people; rather, it rests on the shoulders of Yeshua, who mediates the covenant even beyond death.

 

NEXT WEEK'S READINGS - PARASHAT DEVARIM

Deuteronomy 1:1-3:22
Isaiah 1:1-27
John 19:17-41



 
< Prev   Next >